Houston Texans 2026 Preview
The Houston Texans enter the 2026 season with a sharp forecast of 9.5 wins, aiming for a division-leading finish in a competitive AFC South. Building on their 12-5 record from the previous year, the team faces a Strength of Schedule (SOS) ranked 27th out of 32, indicating a balanced mix of challenges and opportunities. Their strongest units are the Front 7 and Secondary, both ranked #1, while the Offensive Line struggles at #31, highlighting areas needing improvement. Under head coach DeMeco Ryans in his third season, the Texans aim to leverage their defensive strengths while addressing offensive vulnerabilities to secure a top spot in the division.
Snapshot
- Win Total (Sharp Forecast): 9.5
- Division Rank (Projected): 1
- 2025 Record: 12-5
- Strength of Schedule (SOS) Rank (1=Easiest, 32=Hardest): 27
- Average Vegas Line: -2.0
- Home / Road Avg Line: -3.3 / -0.9
- Games Favored / Underdog: 13 / 4
Coaching Staff
- Head Coach: DeMeco Ryans (3 yrs)
- Offensive Coordinator: Nick Caley (1 yr)
- Defensive Coordinator: Matt Burke (3 yrs)
Positional Unit Rankings
| Unit | Rank (1=Best) |
|---|---|
| Quarterbacks | 19 |
| Offensive Line | 31 |
| Receivers | 11 |
| Running Backs | 27 |
| Front 7 | 1 |
| Secondary | 1 |
| Head Coach | 10 |
Strongest Units: Front 7 & Secondary (#1)
Weakest Unit: Offensive Line (#31)
Personnel Impact
Key Free Agents & Trades Added
- Braden Smith (RT) — $10M
- David Montgomery (RB) — Trade
- Reed Blankenship (S) — $8.30M
- Logan Hall (IDL) — $6.90M
- Foster Moreau (TE) — $3.10M
- Dominique Robinson (EDGE) — $3M
- Evan Brown (RG) — $2.5M
- Jake Hummel (LB) — $2.39M
Key Players Lost
- Tytus Howard (RT)
- Joe Mixon (RB)
- Tim Settle (IDL)
- Denico Autry (EDGE)
- Mario Edwards Jr. (IDL)
- Jimmie Ward (S)
- Derek Barnett (EDGE)
- Christian Kirk (WR)
- Folorunso Fatukasi (IDL)
- Christian Harris (LB)
- Nick Chubb (RB)
- Tommy Townsend (P)
- Braxton Berrios (WR)
- Dare Ogunbowale (RB)
- Kurt Hinish (IDL)
- Juice Scruggs (C)
- Damone Clark (LB)
- Myles Bryant (CB)
- Harrison Bryant (TE)
- Brandon Hill (S)
2026 Draft Class
| Rd | Pick | Pos | Player | College |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26 | G | Keylan Rutledge | Georgia Tech |
| 2 | 36 | DT | Kayden McDonald | Ohio State |
| 2 | 59 | TE | Marlin Klein | Michigan |
| 4 | 106 | G | Febechi Nwaiwu | Oklahoma |
| 4 | 123 | LB | Wade Woodaz | Clemson |
| 5 | 141 | S | Kamari Ramsey | USC |
| 6 | 204 | WR | Lewis Bond | Boston College |
| 7 | 243 | LB | Aiden Fisher | Indiana |
Over / Under (9.5 Wins)
Over Case: The Houston Texans have the potential to exceed the 9.5-win threshold due to their elite defensive unit, which ranks among the best in the league. Their front seven and secondary are both ranked first, providing strong coverage and pressure that can limit opponents' scoring opportunities. Additionally, the team’s defense was able to win games without relying heavily on offensive production last season, as evidenced by their 12-5 record despite mediocre offensive metrics. The Texans also have a solid schedule strength ranking of 27, which is considered hard, meaning they will face challenging teams but can still secure wins against them if their defense continues to perform at a high level.
Under Case: Despite their strong defensive foundation, the Texans may struggle to clear the 9.5-win mark due to significant weaknesses on offense. The offensive line ranks last in unit strength, which could hinder both running game effectiveness and quarterback protection. Additionally, the team’s red-zone efficiency was poor, ranking 30th in touchdown percentage, making it difficult to convert opportunities into points. While their field goal accuracy was strong, this alone cannot compensate for a stagnant offense that has historically underperformed. With an average schedule difficulty and a weak offensive unit, the Texans may find it challenging to consistently win enough games to surpass the projected total.
Schedule Timing & Rest
Source: p.281
Team timing ranks vs NFL (1=best)
| Rank type | Rank |
|---|---|
| Net rest edge rank | 1 |
| Prep rank | 24 |
| Rest rank | 10 |
| Short-week road games rank | 6 |
| Games off road SNF/MNF rank | 4 |
| Negated bye rank | 6 |
Schedule Timing & Rest Analysis
The Houston Texans' 2026 schedule is ranked first in net rest edge, indicating they will have the most favorable balance between rest days and preparation time compared to other teams. This ranking suggests that the team's ability to recover between games and prepare for upcoming opponents will be among the best in the league. Their prep rank of 24 shows a moderate level of scheduling difficulty in terms of preparing for each game, while their rest rank of 10 places them above average in having adequate recovery time between contests. The Texans also have a strong showing in short-week road games, ranked sixth, which means they are likely to face fewer challenging road games that require quick turnaround times. Additionally, their ranking of fourth in games off-road during Sunday Night Football (SNF) and Monday Night Football (MNF) indicates they will have more favorable scheduling opportunities when these high-profile matchups occur.
The Texans' negated bye rank of sixth means they are among the teams with fewer instances where a bye week is effectively canceled due to overlapping schedules, which can disrupt team rhythm. This combination of strong net rest edge and reasonable rankings in other timing factors suggests that the Texans will have one of the more balanced schedules in terms of rest and preparation. These elements could contribute positively to their performance and betting value, especially considering their projected win total of 9.5. The schedule appears to support consistent play without excessive strain on players or coaching staff.
Draft Class Impact
The Houston Texans' 2026 draft class focused heavily on strengthening their front seven and secondary, areas where they ranked first in unit strength. Keylan Rutledge, selected in the first round, is expected to replace Jake Andrews as the starting center, addressing a critical need for improved run blocking. Rutledge's performance at Georgia Tech showed he could contribute immediately, with ball carriers averaging 3.0 yards before contact per attempt when running to his gap, one of the best marks among ACC guards. His selection signals a commitment to upgrading the offensive line, which ranks as their weakest unit. Joining Rutledge on the interior is Febechi Nwaiwu, a fourth-round guard who will compete with Evan Brown for the backup role. Given Wyatt Teller's injury history, having depth at guard is crucial, and Nwaiwu’s potential development could provide stability in the long term.
The draft also brought in Kayden McDonald, a second-round defensive tackle known for his run-stuffing ability, which aligns with the Texans' need to improve their run defense. McDonald's 28% tackle rate on run snaps was the highest among FBS nose tackles, making him an immediate impact player on early downs. However, his limited pass-rushing ability—only generating a 4.5% pressure rate last season—means he may not be as effective in passing situations. Meanwhile, Marlin Klein, another second-round pick, is a developmental tight end with little expected playing time this year. His late start in football and underdeveloped skill set suggest he will need significant time to contribute. Overall, the draft class addresses key weaknesses while also adding depth to already strong units like the front seven and secondary.
Critical & Game-Deciding Stats
Source: p.279
| Stat | Value |
|---|---|
| TO Margin | +17 |
| TO Given | 12 |
| INT Given | 9 |
| FUM Given | 3 |
| TO Taken | 29 |
| INT Taken | 19 |
| FUM Taken | 10 |
| Sack Margin | +16 |
| Sacks Allowed | 31 |
| Sacks Recorded | 47 |
| Return TD Margin | +2 |
| Ret TDs | 4 |
| Ret TDs Allow | 2 |
| Penalty Margin | -7 |
| Penalties | 118 |
| Opponent Penalties | 111 |
Offensive & Defensive Advanced Metrics
Source: p.279
Offensive Efficiency/Drive
| Metric | Value (Rank) |
|---|---|
| Pts/D | 1.98 (#22) |
| TD/D | 18% (#27) |
| TO/D | 6% (#1) |
| Punts/D | 38% (#26) |
| 3Out% | 33% (#22) |
| RZDrive% | 28% (#20) |
| Yds/D | 28.5 (#27) |
| DSCv% | 69% (#27) |
Defensive Efficiency/Drive
| Metric | Value (Rank) |
|---|---|
| Pts/D | 1.52 (#2) |
| TD/D | 18% (#4) |
| TO/D | 15% (#4) |
| Punts/D | 44% (#2) |
| 3Out% | 40% (#2) |
| RZDrive% | 24% (#2) |
| Yds/D | 25.7 (#4) |
| DSCv% | 65% (#1) |
Down Analysis Vs NFL Average
Source: p.283
Team ranks vs NFL (1=best, 32=worst) by down:
| Metric | 1st | 2nd | 3rd |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pass Rate | 26 | 7 | 12 |
| EPA/Dropbk | 10 | 20 | 15 |
| Pass Success % | 28 | 19 | 16 |
| Yd/Att | 20 | 12 | 25 |
| 1D/Att | 25 | 22 | 21 |
| Passer Rating | 13 | 24 | 9 |
| 7+ Box Def Faced % | 17 | 19 | 9 |
| EPA/Rush | 29 | 18 | 25 |
| Rush Success % | 28 | 24 | 24 |
| Yd/Rush | 31 | 15 | 14 |
| 1D/Rush | 32 | 20 | 25 |
| Avg Dist To 1st | 29 | 29 | 24 |
Offensive Personnel Usage
Source: p.284
| Personnel | % of plays | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| 1-1 (3WR) | 66.0% | #6 |
| 1-2 (2WR) | 7.7% | #31 |
| 1-3 (1WR) | 1.5% | #25 |
| 2-1 (2WR) | 4.7% | #13 |
| 2-2 (1WR) | 1.3% | #14 |
| 1-0 (4WR) | 0.0% | #16 |
Offensive Performance With Motion (Pre-Snap & Play Action)
Source: p.288
| Pre-Snap Motion | No Play Action | Play Action | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| No | 38% | 49% | 40% |
| Yes | 49% | 55% | 51% |
| Total | 43% | 52% | 45% |
Passing Game: 2025 Recap & 2026 Outlook
In 2025, Houston's passing game showed promise but also revealed areas needing improvement. Quarterback C.J. Stroud set career highs in completion percentage (64.5%) and touchdown rate (4.5%), while reducing his interception rate to 1.9%. However, his average of 217.2 yards per game was the lowest of his career, and his overall success rate of 42.3% ranked 24th in the league. The offense under new coordinator Nick Caley lacked top-down creativity, relying heavily on pre-snap motion (used on 49.9% of dropbacks) and play action (24.8%). When these elements were utilized, Stroud performed well, averaging 8.5 yards per pass attempt and 13.1 yards per completion. Yet, without either strategy, his efficiency dropped significantly to 6.0 Y/A and 9.6 yards per completion. With two years left on his rookie contract, Stroud's development will be crucial for the 2026 season.
Wide receiver Nico Collins continued to be a reliable target, catching 71 passes for 1,117 yards and six touchdowns. Despite his production, Houston struggled to consistently surround him with complementary talent. Xavier Hutchinson led in routes run (62.3%) but underutilized his opportunities, often serving as a blocker for rookie receivers Jayden Higgins and Jaylin Noel. Higgins played on 56.4% of dropbacks while Noel saw just 31.4%. Both should see increased roles in 2026. The return of Tank Dell and the presence of reliable tight end Dalton Schultz could provide more balance to an otherwise inconsistent receiving corps. Meanwhile, the running game struggled with a combined average of 3.8 yards per carry, highlighting the need for improved offensive balance moving forward.
Receiving Game: 2025 Recap & 2026 Outlook
The Houston Texans' receiving corps finished the 2025 season with an overall unit rank of #11, reflecting a solid but unremarkable performance. Key contributors include Nico Collins, who led the team with 71 receptions for 1,117 yards and six touchdowns, maintaining his role as the primary target despite missing time throughout the season. Dalton Schultz, a reliable tight end, added depth to the passing game, contributing 11 catches for 135 yards and two scores. Xavier Hutchinson, who played on 62.3% of dropbacks, showed promise but struggled to convert opportunities into production, often serving as a blocker for younger players like Jayden Higgins and Jaylin Noel. Both Higgins and Noel are expected to see increased roles in 2026, with Higgins playing on 56.4% of dropbacks as a rookie and Noel only seeing 31.4%. The addition of Foster Moreau at tight end could further bolster the receiving options.
Red-zone and early-down targets highlight the importance of Collins, who led all receivers with 18 red-zone targets, followed closely by Dalton Schultz with 11. C.J. Stroud also had a significant presence in the red zone, throwing to multiple players, including Woody Marks and Xavier Hutchinson. The Texans' receiving game will likely benefit from the return of Tank Dell and the continued development of young talent like Higgins. With a strong front seven and secondary, the team is positioned to create more opportunities for its receivers in 2026, though consistency and production from key players will be crucial.
Red Zone Targets Leaderboard
Source: p.288
| Player | All RZ | 1-5 | 6-10 | 11-20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nico Collins | 18 | 7 | 2 | 9 |
| Dalton Schultz | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 |
| Jayden Higgins | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| C.J. Stroud | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Woody Marks | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| Xavier Hutchinson | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| Christian Kirk | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Early Down Targets
Source: p.288
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| WR Target % | 59% |
| TE Target % | 23% |
| RB Target % | 14% |
| WR Target % Rk | #7 |
| TE Target % Rk | #17 |
| RB Target % Rk | #28 |
| WR Success % | 47% |
| TE Success % | 49% |
| RB Success% | 36% |
| WR Success% Rk | #24 |
| TE Success% Rk | #26 |
| RB Success% Rk | #28 |
Rushing Game: 2025 Recap & 2026 Outlook
The Houston Texans' rushing game in 2025 was among the league's weakest, ranking 27th in yards per rush at 3.8 and 29th in success rate at 34.1%. The unit’s struggles were compounded by a historically poor offensive line ranked 31st overall, which limited the effectiveness of even their most productive backs. Woody Marks led the backfield with 33 rushing attempts in the red zone, contributing 9 first-down runs and 6 second-down efforts, while Nick Chubb added 13 total red-zone carries, including 6 first-down runs. Both players showed flashes of potential but were hampered by inconsistent blocking and a lack of explosive plays. Dare Ogunbowale and Jawhar Jordan also contributed in limited roles, with Ogunbowale managing 6 red-zone attempts and Jordan adding 5. The Texans’ inability to consistently move the ball in short-yardage situations highlighted the need for improvement on both sides of the ball.
Looking ahead to 2026, the rushing game will depend heavily on the development of emerging talent like David Montgomery, who was recently drafted, as well as the continued contributions from Marks and Chubb. The offensive line’s poor ranking suggests that even with a stronger running back corps, the unit may struggle to create consistent lanes. However, if the line can improve its performance, it could open up more opportunities for the backs to thrive. With the addition of Tank Dell and Dalton Schultz expected to bolster the receiving game, the Texans might shift some focus to the run game as a complementary element. The 2026 outlook remains cautious, with the rushing unit needing significant upgrades to support the team’s overall offensive strategy.
Red Zone Rushes Leaderboard
Source: p.288
| Player | All RZ | 1-5 | 6-10 | 11-20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Woody Marks | 33 | 9 | 6 | 18 |
| Nick Chubb | 13 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Dare Ogunbowale | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| Jawhar Jordan | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Fantasy Advice & Targets
The Houston Texans' running game struggled in 2025, ranking among the worst in several key categories. Running backs combined for just 3.8 yards per rush, a 34.1% success rate, and only an 8.3% rate of runs gaining 10 or more yards. The team also had a high failure rate, with 20.3% of runs failing to gain any yardage, and just 18.5% resulting in first downs or touchdowns. Their performance was further hampered by poor yards after contact, averaging only 2.76 per rush. In an attempt to improve this aspect, the Texans acquired David Montgomery, who brings a strong background in man/gap running schemes. Despite being bypassed for Jahmyr Gibbs in Detroit, Montgomery still managed solid numbers when on the field, averaging 4.5 yards per rush and posting a 39.9% success rate.
Montgomery's addition is expected to provide stability and efficiency in Houston’s backfield, especially with the team implementing man/gap concepts under new head coach Nick Caley. His ability to thrive in this scheme was evident during his time in Detroit, where he had a 50% success rate on man/gap runs and led all running backs in EPA per rush. While Woody Marks took over as the primary back midseason, Montgomery’s experience and fit within the system could help elevate the overall performance of the rushing attack. With the Texans ranked second in the league in man/gap run rate, Montgomery's presence offers a promising opportunity for improved production in 2026.
Defensive Outlook
The Houston Texans defensive unit is projected to be one of the league's best, ranking first in both the Front 7 and Secondary units. The team excelled against the run in 2025, allowing just 3.7 yards per carry to opposing running backs, which ranked second in the league. Sheldon Rankins re-signed for two years, adding stability to the defensive line, while Tommy Togiai played a key role with 9 run stuffs and a strong 25.6% tackle rate on run defense snaps. The team also bolstered its depth by signing Logan Hall and drafting Kayden McDonald in the second round. Despite losing Tim Settle in free agency, the defensive line remains formidable, led by Will Anderson and Danielle Hunter, who combined for 27 sacks and a strong pressure rate of 42.2%. Their presence gives Houston one of the top pass-rushing duos in the league.
The Texans also performed well against the pass, allowing just 6.5 yards per pass attempt and finishing second in EPA allowed per pass attempt. Derek Stingley is expected to continue his strong play in coverage, though the team faces a challenge with the loss of E.J. Speed, who suffered a season-ending injury during offseason workouts. Al-Shaair and Henry To’oTo’o were reliable starters last year, but without Speed, Houston will need to find a third pass-rushing option quickly. While the front 7 and secondary are strong, the offensive line ranks as the team's weakest unit at #31, which could impact overall defensive performance if not addressed.
Defensive Tendencies
Source: p.287
| Tendency | % | Rank |
|---|---|---|
| Base | 26% | #22 |
| Nickel | 73% | #5 |
| Dime+ | 0% | #30 |
| Rush 3 | 1% | #29 |
| Rush 4 | 77% | #7 |
| Rush 5 | 17% | #23 |
| Rush 6+ | 5% | #17 |
| Blitz% | 22% | #23 |
Red Zone Efficiency
Source: p.288
| RZ metric | Rank |
|---|---|
| EPA/Play | #25 |
| Pass Rate | #15 |
| EPA/Dropbk | #18 |
| Early Dwn EPA/Dropbk | #14 |
| Pass Success % | #25 |
| Yd/Att | #19 |
| Play Action % | #17 |
| EPA/Rush | #30 |
| Early Dwn EPA/Rush | #27 |
| Rush Success % | #30 |
| Yd/Rsh | #29 |
| 3rd Conv % | #23 |
| Motion % | #15 |
Scoring Ranks & Points/Margins
Source: p.288
Scoring ranks
| Metric | Rank |
|---|---|
| 1st Qtr Pts | #12 |
| 2nd Qtr Pts | #11 |
| Halftime Lead | #5 |
| 3rd Qtr Pts | #26 |
| 4th Qtr Pts | #5 |
| 4th Qtr Margin | #1 |
| PPG | #13 |
| Opp PPG | #2 |
| ATS Cover % | #10 |
| ATS Cover Margin | #4 |
Points & margins
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| 1H Pts Mgn | 71 |
| 2H Pts Mgn | 38 |
| 1Q Pts | 82 |
| 1Q Pts Mgn | 22 |
| 2Q Pts | 127 |
| 2Q Pts Mgn | 49 |
| 3Q Pts | 58 |
| 3Q Pts Mgn | -40 |
| 4Q Pts | 137 |
| 4Q Pts Mgn | 78 |
| Ws Up @ Half | 10 |
| Ls Up @ Half | 2 |
| Ws Down @ Half | 2 |
| Ls Down @ Half | 3 |
Penalty Analysis
The Houston Texans' penalty analysis reveals a mixed picture that could impact their performance this season. On the positive side, the defense was above average in surrendering automatic first downs due to less punitive plays, with 41.5% of such instances occurring on non-punitive first-down situations compared to the NFL average of 30.9%. The offense also ranked among the top five in generating beneficial automatic first downs through penalties and was the leading beneficiary of defensive holding penalties and second overall for illegal contact penalties. However, the special teams unit was among the bottom five in terms of penalties, indicating a potential area of concern.
On the flip side, the Texans' offense accounted for 53% of the team's total penalties in 2025, ranking first in intentional grounding and illegal shift infractions. They also averaged the most first-quarter penalties per game during the season, which could disrupt offensive rhythm early. While they were a top-10 penalized team for offensive holding, they ranked among the least penalized on third-down plays, which is a positive note. Additionally, Houston was the No. 1 penalized team for illegal use of hands, highlighting an area that needs improvement. With these penalties potentially affecting game flow and efficiency, the Texans must address their penalty issues if they hope to make a deep playoff run this season.
Bottom Line
The Houston Texans are projected to win 9.5 games in the upcoming 2026 season according to Sharp's forecast, which should not be confused with their 12-5 record from last year. Their schedule strength (SOS) ranks 27th out of 32, indicating a challenging slate of opponents. The team’s strongest units are the Front 7 and Secondary, both ranked #1, while the weakest unit is the Offensive Line at #31. Despite these disparities, the Texans have a solid coaching staff ranked #10 overall.
The forecast suggests Over/Under tension due to the team's strong defensive units and potential for consistent performance. However, the offensive line’s struggles may limit scoring efficiency, especially in critical moments like red-zone situations. The team also faces personnel turnover, which could impact cohesion and development throughout the season.
Rest and efficiency indicators point toward a balanced approach, with the defense expected to hold its own against most opponents while the offense needs to improve consistency. With a strong defensive foundation and a challenging schedule ahead, the Texans are positioned for a competitive season but must address offensive inefficiencies to maximize their win total. The 9.5-win projection reflects both opportunity and risk in this upcoming campaign.